European Foundation
Intelligence Digest
Issue No. 173
7th August 2003
![]()
I. Carving up Turkey
The Turkish government, under pressure from the EU, has passed a law to curb the military’s influence on politics. The reforms have infuriated the military, one of whose top generals, Cetin Dogan, has accused the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, of trying to undermine the Turkish Armed Forces and of attempting to change the secular regime. These clashes have been independently confirmed by sources within the Turkish army, and have been reported in the Turkish press, especially by the leading daily, Milliyet. The reform consists of reducing the influence of the National Security Council, which is dominated by the military. These changes are being implemented because the EU has demanded them as a condition for Turkish accession negotiations. General Dogan reportedly told the prime minister that he was trying to deceive the Turkish people and that one day he would “pay for it”. Another newspaper, Cumhuriyet (Republic) said that other generals at the meeting, which occurred during the annual military congress which takes place to determine military promotions, supported Dogan. The EU has also demanded greater rights for the Kurds as a condition for negotiations. The army’s position is that it supports EU membership but is opposed to too many concessions which might hurt national security. [Selcan Hacaoglu, Turkish Daily News, 8th August 2003]
In addition to reducing the army’s
influence in the National Security Council, a new amnesty law has also been
passed for Kurdish rebels. Following
the withdrawal of some 2,000 fighters from the PKK into Northern Iraq, the
amnesty law provides for those who did not actively participate in violent
attacks between 1984 and 1999 to go unpunished. Other fighters will receive reduced sentences if they provide the
Turkish authorities with information about their activities and networks. The Interior Minister has said that those
wishing to take advantage of the amnesty law, which will be valid for 6 months,
should spend no more than two days in detention before being allowed to return
to their villages. [Anadolu Agency, 6th
August 2003]
In other developments, the leading daily Hurriyet has
commented on private visits paid to Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy US Defence
Secretary, by an adviser to the Turkish prime minister, Cuneyt Zapsu. These meetings have caused unease in Ankara,
because Wolfowitz, who takes a strong interest in Turkey, was harshly critical
of the decision not to allow US troops the use of Turkish territory to attack
Iraq. During his most recent visit to
the United States, the foreign minister of Turkey, Abdullah Gül, told Paul
Wolfowitz, “We cannot meddle in your talks.
However, we would suggest that you opt for the official channels. That way, you can read our policies
correctly and you won’t be making mistakes.”
Gül made it clear that the “mistakes” in question might include a
repetition of the surprise vote in the Turkish parliament on 1st
March which went against the American request, and against the government’s
acquiescence in it. Zapsu had come
under criticism for raising Wolfowitz’s hopes too much regarding the likely
position of Turkey on allowing its territory for the use of an attack on
Iraq. [Hürriyet, 4th August 2003]
II.
EU corruption – the usual story
Telekom
Serbia affair implicates Prodi
Igor Marini,
the man arrested in Switzerland on 8th May and then subsequently
extradited to Italy, in connection with the sale in 1997 of Telekom Serbia by
Telecom Italia, for which it is alleged that significant bribes were paid, has
said that he wishes to address the committee in the Italian parliament which is
dealing with the affair. He has not,
for the time being, made the “stunning accusations” which he promised when he
was initially caught, even though he did at that time mention the names of
Romano Prodi, the current president of the European Commission who was Italian
prime minister at the time of the sale, Lamberto Dini, the then foreign
minister, and Piero Fassino, the then deputy foreign minister. Marini alleges that they all received bribes
for the sale, which they have immediately denied. Accused of financial fraud, Marini was interrogated for many
hours by the investigating magistrates in Turin who are looking into the
Telekom Serbia affair. Marini is said
to have confirmed that he met Mrs. Lamberto Dini and gave her a suitcase with
$5 million in cash in it. Marini claims
that he distributed a total of €225 million in bribes, of which about €100
million went to Prodi, €50 million to Dini and about €60 million to Fassino. Others say that Marini is a professional
liar. [Salvatore Aloise, Le Monde,
1st August 2003]
Pressures grows on Schreyer
Political pressure is said to be growing on the commissar with responsibility for the EU budget, the German Michaele Schreyer, over the continuing Eurostat scandal. Hans-Gert Pöttering, the leader of the Christian Democrat group in the European Parliament, has said that, “seriously wrong behaviour should lead to personal consequences, including the resignation of a commissar.” But pressure is also being brought to bear on Pedro Solbes and Neil Kinnock, respectively commissars for monetary policy and institutional reform. Pöttering said he did not want to comment on their behaviour but preferred to wait for the publication of a report on the Eurostat scandal by OLAF, the Commission’s anti-fraud office. Pöttering said that Kinnock had promised to make the Commission into the most efficient administration in the world – he made this promise when the “new” commission was appointed, following the wholesale resignation of the Santer commission in 1999 - but that he and other commission members would now seriously have to ask themselves whether that goal has been achieved.
It
remains unclear whether employees of Eurostat were actually stealing from the
EU budget. In an earlier report,
though, OLAF did refer to “systematic plunder”, and the Commission is accused
of not acting quickly enough. [Helmut Bünder, Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung, 2nd August 2003]
But the European Parliament is unlikely to vote
no confidence in the Commission again because, ultimately, MEPs and commissars
are all part of the same machinery and the MEPs are too afraid of plunging the
whole of Brussels into chaos, just as the new constitution is being drawn up and
as new members are joining. So the dogs
bark, but the caravan moves on.
III.
Other EU News
The two biggest
trading blocs in the world are nearing agreement on agricultural subsidies in
time for a mini-summit of the World Trade Organisation on 11th
August. Both sides have said that they
are looking at ways of reducing agricultural subsidies together. The WTO deals with internal subsidies,
export subsidies and access to emerging markets. Pascal Lamy, the EU’s foreign trade commissar, has said that the
two sides will try to present a proposal on agricultural subsidies to the big
Cancún summit from 10th – 14th September. This summit will require daily meetings
between the delegations of the 146 member states of the WTO, starting on 11th
August, in order to prepare the terrain for the ministerial meeting in
Mexico. The Cancún summit is part of
the Doha round of trade negotiations, commenced in 2001, which is expected to
finish in 2004. [Agence France Presse, Le Monde,
30th July 2003]
Trichet
confirmed
Following a
favourable vote by the European Central Bank council on 31st July,
and a green light from the European Parliament which is expected in September,
Jean-Claude Trichet, the present Governor of the Bank of France, is expected to
become the next president of the ECB on 1st November. The details of the ECB vote will remain
secret until 2033, when the archives will be opened to the public. Trichet’s appointment became possible after
he was acquitted on 18th June of all charges relating to the
collapse of Crédit Lyonnais. As
Director of the Treasury at the time, Trichet had been accused of contributing
to the publication of false accounts which misrepresented the bank’s
position. This vote confirms the
agreement reached in 1998 when France and Germany agreed to divvy up the
presidency of the ECB between them (the Germans putting the Dutchman, Wim
Duisenberg, in place). Once the
European Parliament has approved the choice during its plenary session from 22nd
to 25th September, it will remain only for the heads of state and
government of the eurozone to confirm it.
[Le
Monde, 31st July 2003]
The German economics minister, Wolfgang
Clement, has been forced to insist that unemployment will not reach 5 million
following the publication of statistics which show that seasonally adjusted
unemployment in July rose by 95,000 to 4.35 million, the highest July figures
since the reunification of Germany in 1990.
Clement claimed that order books for German companies were up by
2.3%. [Die Welt, 7th August 2003]
Berlusconi
says ‘I feel almost German’
The Italian
prime minister has tried to make light of the row sparked off between Italy and
Germany by his joke in the European Parliament about how a German Social Democrat MEP would make a good
actor for the kapo in a Nazi concentration camp. In an interview to the mass circulation Bild newspaper, he
has said that “the close relations between Italy and Germany have never been as
good as they are now.” He said that the
two countries were united in “solidarity, sympathy and an indestructible common
interest.” Of the infelicitous remark
made at the expense of Martin Schulz, Berlusconi said that he could not
understand how something so irrelevant could be blown up out of all
proportion. “I just wanted to make a
joke to lighten the atmosphere; I had no intention of offending him, on the
contrary, it was my attempt to react ironically to his behaviour, which was
very offensive to me, to my government and to my country.” Berlusconi also accused the Italian left of
exaggerating the row for its own political purposes. Berlusconi also said that he felt “almost German”: “In Italy I am thought of like that because
of my passion for work, and also because I am from Milan, the city where people
work the hardest.” When asked for the
secret of his success, Berlusconi replied, “Work, work, work.” Mr. Berlusconi
has also said that he wants to act as an intermediary between President Bush
and Chancellor Schröder. He said, “My
tendency is to smooth over differences and arguments.” He said the time had come to move beyond the
Iraq crisis. Berlusconi has kept up
good relations with George W. Bush, even visiting the ranch at Crawford
recently. By contrast, relations
between Bush and Schröder are strained:
they see each other only at big international meetings. Mr. Berlusconi also said that he thought
Joschka Fischer was a “natural candidate” for the post of EU foreign minister,
which the European constitution is expected to create. He said that Fischer combined competence
with idealism – “two gifts which do not always go together”. [Bild-Zeitung, 5th
August 2003]
An exhibition on
the Red Army Fraction, founded by Andreas Baader and Ulrike Meinhof at the end
of 1960s, has caused a stir in Germany.
The Bild newspaper, using an official subsidy of some €100,000,
is preparing an exhibition about the gang, for which one of the organisers is
said to have written the following preparatory note: “What ideas and ideals of the RAF have kept their value
throughout the years, and cannot be rejected because of their naiveté?” The son of Hanns-Martin Schleyer, the head
of the German business confederation who was kidnapped and murdered by the RAF
in 1977, as well as the widow of Detlev Rohwedder, the head of the East German
privatisation office who was murdered in 1991, have immediately protested to
Chancellor Schröder at the fact that “such an exhibition can be held with the approval
and even the financial support of the state”.
“Our concerns are not just personal,” they have written, saying that the
exhibition is dangerous because it might contribute to the “legend and
glorification of the RAF”. The
controversy has spread and now many politicians have expressed their
views. The Interior Minister, Otto
Schily, who acted as lawyer for Gudrun Esslin, one of the members of the
Baader-Meinhof gang, has said that the exhibition should not be held. The Green deputy, Hans-Christian Ströbele,
former lawyer for Andreas Baader himself, has said that it should go
ahead. The organisers have protested
that the exhibition is not intended to glorify the gang, but it has nonetheless
been prudently put off until the autumn of 2004. [Georges Marion,
Le Monde, 30th July 2003]
Belgium
abolishes universal jurisdiction law
Belgium has
now effectively abrogated its 1993 “universal jurisdiction” law which was
creating so many political difficulties for it, especially with Israel and the
United States of America. The Belgian
Senate has now approved an earlier vote by deputies, which creates a new law to
replace the old one. The new law
reduces to almost zero the possibilities which the old law seemed to offer to
prosecute the presumed culprits of war crimes before Belgian courts, whatever
their nationality and whatever the nationality of their victims. According to the new law, either the alleged
perpetrator or the alleged victim must have some connection with Belgium,
either by being Belgian nationals or in virtue of having been resident in
Belgium for at least three years.
Moreover, the law stipulates that the current rules on immunity must be
respected: these were laid down by the
International Court of Justice in 2002 which stated that Belgium did not have
the right to prosecute the former foreign minister of Congo because he had
immunity from Belgian jurisdiction in virtue of his office. The reason for the decision to create a new
law was the rapidly deteriorating relations between Belgium and the USA and
Israel. Civil parties indicted numerous
leaders under the old law, including George W. Bush, Tony Blair and Ariel
Sharon. The Belgian government has been criticised for abrogating the law by
“human rights” groups who are ideologically wedded to the concept of universal
jurisdiction; but it has justified its decision by saying that the law was
being massively abused by people wishing to bring politically motivated
suits. [Le Figaro, 4th
August 2003]
Olympic
games
The mayor of
Athens says that she wants to wants to issue 230 new licences for brothels, in
preparation for the Olympic Games in the Greek capital next year. Dora Bakoyannis, the apparently conservative
mayor, says that she wants the new licences to be issued in conformity with the
1999 law which allows brothels providing they are registered, and providing
that they are at least 200 metres away from churches, schools, hospitals, old
people’s homes and other brothels, and providing that they are not open for
more than 8 hours a day. The Orthodox
Church has protested, as have more liberal interests like the US State
Department and the Government of Sweden which accuse Greece of being lax about
sexual exploitation and people trafficking.
Prostitutes have protested in Athens outside the Interior Ministry,
saying that the law inhibits their right to work freely. [Der Spiegel, 4th August 2003]
More
killing in Kosovo
Although you
wouldn’t know it from the parish newsletter information doled out on the web
site of the Nato forces in Kosovo,
http://www.nato.int/kfor/welcome.html, the troubled Southern Serbian province
remains a dangerous place. Three people
were killed at the weekend after a shoot-out in Peć, and four more were
wounded. Of the four wounded, Rexhep
Kelmendi, the owner of a hotel, had already been attacked twice before. Such shootings, whether criminal or
politically motivated, are common. [Der Spiegel, 3rd
August 2003]
Poland
sends troops to Iraq
Poland is
finally sending its first large contingent of soldiers to Iraq. But arguments are already breaking out among
the states which compose it about how much they will be paid, how long they
have to stay, and what the risks are.
Poland’s president admitted that there is considerable unease in his
country when he commented that, “People need more information.” According to polls, 55% of Poles are opposed
to their troops being sent to Iraq, and only a third actually support the deployment. The internationally minded press has been
doing its best to convince public opinion, with the liberal daily Gazeta
Wyborcza stating somewhat didactically that “Poland’s role is to be an ally
of Great Britain and the USA.” 1,700
Polish soldiers are expected to arrive in Iraq this week, and the US command
has ascribed to them a district in the south of Baghdad which is supposedly
quieter than the rest of the capital.
But on Friday evening, the first attack took place on the Polish camp
even before the soldiers had arrived.
The Pentagon plans for Poland to assume the command of a 9,200
international force in September. In
that force there will be a total of 29 countries represented, from Azerbaijan
to Mongolia, and from the Philippines to Slovakia. Many suspect that these countries are sending their troops only
because they will get paid by the Americans to do so, which has led to the
international force being dubbed “the coalition of the billing”. The force will cost the US taxpayer some
$240 million this year alone, according to Dov Zakheim, the chief accountant at
the Pentagon. It is also not clear how
useful these soldiers are going to be:
Hungary has already said that it will withdraw its 300 troops if there
is any sign of a “warlike situation” developing. Italy has said it will send new soldiers after four months, to
maintain morale. El Salvador has
postponed sending its elite troops because they say they are underpaid. But perhaps the biggest dividends to be
reaped from sending troops are political.
Nothing illustrates this better than the case of Ukraine, which seems to
have made a spectacular political comeback in the eyes of the Americans. Last year, the American secret services
accused the Ukrainian president, Leonid Kuchma, of personally approving the
sale of radar equipment to Baghdad. At
the Nato summit in Prague last November, the place-names were deliberately
translated into French so that “Ukraine” was not next to “United States” and so
George Bush did not have to sit next to the Ukrainian leader. Now, it is all sweetness and light between
Kiev and Washington. Kuchma has agreed
to send 2,300 soldiers to Iraq, an offer eagerly accepted by the Pentagon. Paris, however, has continued to refuse to
send any troops, saying that first responsibility for running the country would
have to be placed in the hands of the United Nations. [Der
Satndard, Vienna, 4th August 2003]
Azerbaijan
dynasty established
The ailing octogenarian president of the
former Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan, Heidar Aliev, has arranged from his Turkish
hospital bed that his son, Ilham Aliev, be appointed the country’s prime
minister. According to the Azeri
constitution, the prime minister exercises the powers of the president if he is
incapacitated. It is clear that the son
is now Aliev’s designated successor.
Aliev père has been in hospital in a clinic near Ankara since 8th
July, suffering from heart problems.
Ilham Aliev has for long been an important figure in Azerbaijan,
especially because he is the president of the state oil company Socar, as well
as being chairman of the Azeri Olympic committee. Heidar Aliev has governed Azerbaijan with only a brief
interruption in the 1990s since he became the First Secretary of the Party in
1969. [Le Figaro, 4th August 2003]
Published by The
European Foundation, 62, Brompton Road, London SW3 1BL
Tel. + 44 20 7590
9901, fax 7590 9975, euro.foundation@e-f.org.uk